Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Buffered version of AmazonCloudWatchClient #1109

Closed
amagnus opened this issue Apr 7, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

Buffered version of AmazonCloudWatchClient #1109

amagnus opened this issue Apr 7, 2017 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
feature-request A feature should be added or improved.

Comments

@amagnus
Copy link

amagnus commented Apr 7, 2017

Hello,

I was wondering if something is in the works to add a buffered version of AmazonCloudWatchClient in the SDK?

We have been happily using AmazonSQSBufferedAsyncClient with SQS.

@millems millems added the feature-request A feature should be added or improved. label Apr 8, 2017
@millems
Copy link
Contributor

millems commented Apr 8, 2017

To clarify, you mean a client to which you can write cloud watch events, and they will be buffered until an explicit call to some kind of a flush() method is made, or a size/time limit is encountered?

@amagnus
Copy link
Author

amagnus commented Apr 8, 2017

That's correct. That would enable us to minimize the quantity of cloudwatch calls by automatically making requests in batches of 20 items (which is the max for putMetricData for instance).

@millems
Copy link
Contributor

millems commented Apr 10, 2017

Cool, I understand the feature request. Feel free to list off any specific features here that we might not think of that would be beneficial to you. We'll be sure to consider them if we implement something like this.

@anoopgarlapati
Copy link

Hi, this feature would be great for us too. Is there any estimate on this?

@debora-ito
Copy link
Member

@amagnus @anoopgarlapati

The SDK team are concentrating efforts on V2 new features so they decided not to implement this one in V1. It's still being considered for V2, you can track the issue here: aws/aws-sdk-java-v2#165.

I'll go ahead and close this, please feel free to comment on the V2 issue with your use case and reach out if you have further questions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature-request A feature should be added or improved.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants