Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEAT]: ServerApps Sorting and Collapsing #233

Open
mandopatriot opened this issue Apr 2, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

[FEAT]: ServerApps Sorting and Collapsing #233

mandopatriot opened this issue Apr 2, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@mandopatriot
Copy link

Feature Description

I would like to be able to sort the ServApps by different types, such as alphabetical order and updates available.

Also, possibly a toggle to collapse the ServApps to allow more ServApps visible on the screen, such as only showing name/ports/action buttons/etc. This way we can still see the big details if needed but can also have a smaller footprint if wanted.

@BearTS
Copy link
Contributor

BearTS commented Jun 7, 2024

hmm this would be a nice feature

@plangin
Copy link

plangin commented Jun 17, 2024

+1 for some sorting options

At least manually, then we could them by alphabet. Even the smaller CasaOS offers it in a really nice way.

@j0nsgh
Copy link

j0nsgh commented Oct 2, 2024

+1, actually posted this over in the discussions under ideas as well.

Hey there! Not sure if its a simple request but in the ServApps section, it would be nice to have a filter or sort function by name, or port, or network, etc. Even a simple sort by name would be nice. Right now I think it sorts by creation (newest shows first).

The other item is to have a minimal view on the ServApps page, basically name, icon, action buttons, and then a 'click for more' to drop the details, or 'show all', etc.

Anyway, just some thoughts. Loving it so far and moving my items from CASAOS to this now actually.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants