Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lacking a method for identifying manufacturing instructions while in branch #50

Open
hraftery opened this issue Oct 14, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@hraftery
Copy link

We don't have a documented method of providing unique identifiers to design files such as BOMs, so they can be identified when submitting to a third party (eg. a manufacturer) for processing. This has led to confusion about what version has been sent, regressions when re-submitting, and breakdowns when incorporating changes during the design process.

The de-facto identifier for design files in the master branch is the VERSION, provided by VersionBot. This works well. So the gap is design files that exist in a branch, such as during the lifetime of a PR.

A proposal was raised in this brainstorm topic. Over some discussion, the proposal was broadly acceptable, although no firm conclusion was made on the various questions it raises. In the interim, it probably serves as a useful guide and a dramatic improvement on no guide at all.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant