You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I found that running a version of hifiasm compiled locally on our cluster, is significantly faster than running the conda version. I checked the conda recipes here: https://github.com/bioconda/bioconda-recipes/tree/master/recipes/hifiasm, but cannot find anything abnormal. Could you please let me know is there any other things may affect the compiling of conda? Related issue: chhylp123/hifiasm#392.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
colinbrislawn
changed the title
Conda version is 3-5 time slower than manually built version
hifiasm on conda is 3-5 time slower than locally built version
Mar 27, 2023
Hello,
I found that running a version of hifiasm compiled locally on our cluster, is significantly faster than running the conda version. I checked the conda recipes here: https://github.com/bioconda/bioconda-recipes/tree/master/recipes/hifiasm, but cannot find anything abnormal. Could you please let me know is there any other things may affect the compiling of conda? Related issue: chhylp123/hifiasm#392.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: