From f886644bb502f50727b03cb1d299aa0c4b89b215 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Sztorc Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 18:47:31 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] no dash Co-authored-by: Jon Atack --- bip-0301.mediawiki | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/bip-0301.mediawiki b/bip-0301.mediawiki index 85e722cce..4988e3663 100644 --- a/bip-0301.mediawiki +++ b/bip-0301.mediawiki @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ However, traditional MM has two drawbacks: We use notation side:\* and main:\* in front of otherwise ambiguous words (such as "block", "node", or "chain"), to distinguish the mainchain version from its sidechain/alt-chain counterpart. We name all sidechain users "Simon", and name all mainchain miners "Mary". -Furthermore, here is an example of BIP-301 in use. Imagine that a side:block contains 20,000 txns, each paying a $0.10 fee; therefore, the side:block is worth $2000 of fee revenue. In BIP-301, the sidechain's coinbase txn will pay this $2000 to "Simon". Simon does no hashing, but instead makes one L1 txn paying $1999 to the L1 miners ("Mary"). Thus, Mary ends up with all of the fee-revenue, even though she didn't do anything on the sidechain. +Furthermore, here is an example of BIP-301 in use. Imagine that a side:block contains 20,000 txns, each paying a $0.10 fee; therefore, the side:block is worth $2000 of fee revenue. In BIP-301, the sidechain's coinbase txn will pay this $2000 to "Simon". Simon does no hashing, but instead makes one L1 txn paying $1999 to the L1 miners ("Mary"). Thus, Mary ends up with all of the fee revenue, even though she didn't do anything on the sidechain. {| class="wikitable"