Connecting to Reolink cams directly vs Reolink NVR #16773
Replies: 6 comments 3 replies
-
you're using the incorrect hwaccel_args |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have a Intel N100 based system that runs Frigate. For direct cam connections I did not specifiy hwaccel_args initially so it used the default (whatever that is for this system). Then I tried preset-intel-qsv-h264. I had issues with both. PS: I asked Reolink support to provide me with Frigate compatible cam firmware. They provided me with "some" firmware but it did not really fix my issues. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This is my latest log. I've configured all my cams to use qsv and connecting to them directly. I've also attached my Frigate config.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Using http does not work. See log:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
After rebooting all my cameras, using qsv and rtsp streams for all of them I had only a single error in the last 15 hours (see below). So it seems that my system has become much more stable when using qsv. HTTP streams do not work with 2 of my cams at all.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have multiple Reolink cameras (RLC-510A, RLC-811A, RLC-511WA, E1 Pro) and a Reolink NVR (RLN8-410). Initially I configured Frigate (0.14 and 0.15) to connect to all cams directly via rtsp and this kind of worked but I got lots of errors like the ones below. I then configured frigate to get the streams from the Reolink NVR and since then I'm getting almost no errors.
It seems that the Reolink NVR is more compatible with Frigate than the cams. Can someone confirm this?
My goal is to eventually replace the Reolink NVR with Frigate.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions