Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add custom marker for checking validation #3209

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

alexgromero
Copy link
Contributor

Add custom marker for running model validation tests

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.14%. Comparing base (3faa7f5) to head (f6836f8).
Report is 41 commits behind head on develop.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #3209   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    93.14%   93.14%           
========================================
  Files           66       66           
  Lines        14248    14248           
========================================
  Hits         13272    13272           
  Misses         976      976           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@SamRemis SamRemis merged commit e3e7331 into boto:develop Jun 25, 2024
34 checks passed
aws-sdk-python-automation added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2024
* release-1.34.134:
  Bumping version to 1.34.134
  Update to latest models
  Add custom marker for checking validation (#3209)
hswong3i pushed a commit to alvistack/boto-botocore that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2024
Co-authored-by: Alessandra Romero <lromales@amazon.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants