You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Many OSM tools, such as JSOM, assign negative IDs to OSM entities, this denotes that the given entity has not yet been united with the main OSM dataset.
The OSM PBF supports negative IDs, but IdTableBuilder only supports u64.
Here is example data that crashes osmflatc. 4nodes.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I assume they are still sorted in the normal way (increasing, negative before positive)? In that case we could just convert Ids to be signed and everything should mostly work as-is.
Looks like the PBF format actually specifies an ID as signed 64 bit int. I guess I made a wrong assumption when porting the format about the ids. I would propose just to change the type of IDs and allow them to be negative. WDYT?
Many OSM tools, such as JSOM, assign negative IDs to OSM entities, this denotes that the given entity has not yet been united with the main OSM dataset.
The OSM PBF supports negative IDs, but
IdTableBuilder
only supports u64.Here is example data that crashes osmflatc.
4nodes.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: