Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The scenario title does not seem right #137

Open
pjanck opened this issue Jan 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

The scenario title does not seem right #137

pjanck opened this issue Jan 27, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@pjanck
Copy link
Contributor

pjanck commented Jan 27, 2024

@implementer-agreement
@ALB
@disabled
Feature: ALB005 - Positioning of referents
The rule verifies that IfcReferents (typed POSITION or STATION) linked to IfcAlignments need a IfcRelPositions relationship
Scenario: Agreement on each IfcAlignment being aggregated to IfcProject and not contained in IfcSpatialElement
Given A model with Schema "IFC4.3"
Given An IfcReferent
Given PredefinedType = 'POSITION' or 'STATION'

@aothms
Copy link
Collaborator

aothms commented Jan 27, 2024

Agreed, proposal:

Agreement on IfcReferents (typed POSITION or STATION) to need a IfcRelPositions relationship to IfcAlignment

This rule is currently not activated though (@disabled)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants