Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WAIT step #12

Closed
zaclang opened this issue Aug 3, 2020 · 8 comments
Closed

WAIT step #12

zaclang opened this issue Aug 3, 2020 · 8 comments

Comments

@zaclang
Copy link

zaclang commented Aug 3, 2020

Hi folks, I can see adding WAIT functionality is on your roadmap. Do you have any idea on when that might be available?

In lieu of that I guess I could do some polling to see when the build is done?

@EnricoMi
Copy link
Contributor

EnricoMi commented Oct 8, 2021

You could use https://github.com/EnricoMi/download-buildkite-artifact-action to wait for the build in the meanwhile.

@espipj
Copy link

espipj commented Feb 22, 2023

is there any timeline for this feature to be implemented?

@lizrabuya
Copy link
Contributor

lizrabuya commented Feb 23, 2023

is there any timeline for this feature to be implemented?

Hi @espipj, We will try to get this scheduled in a week or two.

@lizrabuya
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @espipj , sorry this has slipped into our radar. Do you think polling as suggested by @zaclang would work for you as a workaround? The contributor that added the WAIT step into the road map has already left therefore we needed to review the scope of this work.

@espipj
Copy link

espipj commented Aug 31, 2023

Hello @lizrabuya . It is definitely not ideal but it seems that's what @EnricoMi action is doing if I'm not wrong. So that's what I am using at the moment.

@davidohlin
Copy link

any news on timeline? Would prefer not to poll :(

@jradtilbrook
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @davidohlin I think polling is the only option here as there is no gear that would allow waiting on a step. The best we could do is "hide" the polling within this action workflow so its transparent to the user.

However, this isn't high on our list of things to get to - although we do agree it would be useful.

Would you be open to providing a PR to add this functionality? That would help us out a lot

@lizrabuya
Copy link
Contributor

This issues should be addressed in this PR #62

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants