You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While the details of the case studies are interesting, the bulk of the paper is devoted to the case study descriptions and results, with less focus on the implementation. The discussion section is shorter than I expected it should be. This article aims to be very practice-ready, i.e., persuading practitioners to convert to activity based approaches, but the details of that conversion are somewhat limited. I wonder if a practitioner would be able to extract the lessons needed to make the shift (though table 4 is quite helpful). In a revision, I suggest diving a little deeper into the decision-making process of the modeler, focusing on questions that she/he needs to decide to transition to activity models.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Can we restructure the paper to focus more on the construction and development and analysis of the case studies, and less on the results? This might get us in less trouble with the #4 issue
Reviewer 2:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: