generated from byu-transpolab/template_bookdown
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
02-literature.Rmd
23 lines (17 loc) · 1.01 KB
/
02-literature.Rmd
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
# Literature
Here is a review of existing methods. Use the `bookdown` [@xie2015] package
referencing system to make it easy on yourself.
The literature review is not simply a "review" or a list of what has been
done in the past. This needs to a thoughtful synthesis that accomplishes two
things:
- Shows that you understand the previous efforts that other people have
made on this problem.
- Identifies the limitation or the gap in those previous efforts.
You will have already mentioned this gap in the introduction, but here you need
to build a solid case for why what you are doing is a meaningful contribution.
Literature reviews do not have a specific guidelines for length or number of
citations. It's more about making a rhetorical argument; if it's a new problem
then the review can be shorter. But you'll need to refer to previous attempts at
the problem, the methods you are trying, and other things.
@zhang2021type analyzed the e-scooter route choice for a system deployed in
Blacksburg, Virginia.