-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 172
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Component amendment]: Table #5448
Comments
Thank you for reporting your feedback to us! The internal ticket has been created: https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/WD-18355.
|
Review:
Priority: Medium |
modular table spec - responsive behavior suggestions: some alternative suggestions we haven't explored, courtesy of chatgpt (excuse the title case):
|
I'm not sure ChatGPT listed an old favorite of mine, so maybe it's number 7: multiline rows that wrap cells to make a single data item use multiple visual lines. Often with a key "cell" that spans and intra-table borders to prevent visual confusion. (I guess you could call those full-width cards, conceptually. But You could call an ordinary table that, too.) |
Component/pattern to amend
Tables
Visual
Context
I was reviewing this PR for /kubernetes/compare and I'm not sure the way the table resizes into cards is the easiest way for users to compare the features. At the same time, horizontal scrolling might be difficult for a table that's this text-heavy. Maybe a possible solution could be a drop down to select which feature to compare, and then displaying the values for the feature in a table format? Or allow multiple select to compare select features?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: