From 9af2804faa1005c4d83eabcb163937d8a9b5d742 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kata Martin Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 13:05:52 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Add press coverage links --- articles/climate-risk-comparison/index.md | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/articles/climate-risk-comparison/index.md b/articles/climate-risk-comparison/index.md index 2b70af9d..52b5a985 100644 --- a/articles/climate-risk-comparison/index.md +++ b/articles/climate-risk-comparison/index.md @@ -17,6 +17,11 @@ components: src: ./components/summary-table.js - name: RegionSummary src: ./components/region-summary.js +links: + - label: 'Press coverage #1' + href: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-08-09/clashing-risk-predictions-cast-doubt-on-black-box-climate-models + - label: 'Press coverage #2' + href: https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2024-flood-fire-climate-risk-analytics --- You might assume that buying a climate risk assessment means buying a singular truth. Unfortunately, that’s not the case. Climate risk assessmentsClimate risks are often categorized as either physical (associated with the impacts of climate change) or transition (associated with the transition away from fossil fuels). This article exclusively considers physical climate risks. reflect a long [chain of modeling](https://carbonplan.org/research/climate-risk-assessments) and a variety of [scientific and technical decisions](https://carbonplan.org/blog/climate-risk-metadata). While there’s, of course, agreement that the planet is warming, when it comes to predicting specific impacts in specific locations, there’s no one correct projection.