Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 10, 2024. It is now read-only.

Fix : display value cost model #3098

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

tungnguyendinh
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Fix : display value cost model

Checklist before requesting a review

Issue ticket number and link

  • This PR has a valid ticket number or issue: [link]

Testing & Validation

  • This PR has been tested/validated in Chrome, Firefox, Safari and Brave browsers.
  • The code has been tested locally with test coverage match expectations.
  • Added new Unit/Component testing (if relevant).

Security

  • No secrets are being committed (i.e. credentials, PII)
  • This PR does not have any significant security implications

Code Review

  • There is no unused functionality or blocks of commented out code (otherwise, please explain below)
  • In addition to this PR, all relevant documentation (e.g. Confluence / README.md file) and architecture diagrams (e.g. Miro) were updated

Design Review

  • If this PR contains changes to the UI, it has gone through a design review with UX Designer or Product owner.
  • In case PR contains changes to the UI, add some screenshots to notice the differences

Chrome

Before
After

Safari

Before
After

Responsive

Before
After

Sotatek-TaiTruong and others added 7 commits February 29, 2024 20:17
…-forgot-pass

fix: remove dot ui in forgot password page
…rch-pool-when-search-global

fix: remove value search pool when search global
…umn-token-in-page-address-detail

fix: update-width-column-token-in-page-address-detail
@tungnguyendinh tungnguyendinh added the dev-test This label is for sota test purpose label Mar 1, 2024
@tungnguyendinh tungnguyendinh deleted the fix/display-value-cost-model branch March 1, 2024 08:50
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
dev-test This label is for sota test purpose
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants