Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Validation of the flooding model #188

Open
DenoBeno opened this issue Aug 24, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Validation of the flooding model #188

DenoBeno opened this issue Aug 24, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@DenoBeno
Copy link

Please validate if the flooding model is working as it should, e.g. by comparing the EMIKAT data against pre-calculated data in Naples.

@DenoBeno
Copy link
Author

DenoBeno commented Aug 24, 2020

Heinrich has found one error in calculation. Now the data looks more plausible for Linz.

image

https://csis.myclimateservice.eu/study/37/step/1643/view/maps

flood damage class left, price in euros right.

I still have some questions/doubts:

  1. Why is industry not vulnerable to floods? Is this realistic?
  2. There seems to be little difference in hazard according to different scenarios. There is a difference between 1/5/20y events. Is this realistic for Linz?

As I said, it's probably the best to look at Naples where we know how the floods should look like.

@patrickkaleta
Copy link

How is the validation coming along? Who is currently working on that?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants