Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 9, 2022. It is now read-only.

Latest commit

 

History

History
35 lines (31 loc) · 1.37 KB

peer-feedback.md

File metadata and controls

35 lines (31 loc) · 1.37 KB

Peer review exercise

Goal

  • Understand the rubric better
  • Get feedback on your work
  • Help a peer by giving feedback on their work

Preparation

  • Read the rubric. Is everything clear? (dynamic means the visualization would still work for different data in the same format)
  • Push the latest changes to your readme, code, and wiki
  • Pair up in groups of two

Review

Take about 20 minutes to do this

  • Scan someone else's repo
    • gitignore
    • link to live demo on github pages
    • description
    • concept
    • image
    • data used (what's done with invalid and empty values?)
    • plagiarism and acknowledgements
  • Read the wiki, can you follow the datacleaning and transforming process?
  • Read the code
    • try to understand the code flow
    • Do you see any improvements?
    • Be sure to check code quality (is it functional, consistency, reusability, naming conventions etc.)
  • Assess assignment according to rubric (If you cant assess something, write in an issue why)
  • Write your feedback in issues on their repo (separate issue for each thing)
  • Positive feedback is also welcome and can be put into an issue

Closure

  • Review the issues that were created for your own repo. Ask your peer about them if you don't understand.
  • Respond to the issues with an action (for instance: valid point, will fix)
  • Close relevant issues before the assessment by solving them.