[Proposal] Green Reviews Working Group

[nikimanoledaki]

Description

This is a proposal to create a new Working Group (WG) under the CNCF Environmental Sustainability TAG (TAG ENV).

Please see this document for more info.

TODO

• TAG Environmental Sustainability lead representative: @leonardpahlke
• Project leader(s): @nikimanoledaki @guidemetothemoon
• Project Members who have contributed to this WG Proposal discussion:
  • Chrystian Blas
  • Max Körbächer
  • Christopher Hanson
  • Antonio Di Turi
  • Eduardo Rivero
  • Alexis Carrel Billiard
  • and many more - thank you! 💚
• Fill in addition TODO items here so the project team and community can see progress!
• Scope
• Deliverable(s)
• Project Schedule
• Slack Channel (as needed)
• Meeting Time & Day:
• Meeting Notes (link)
• Meeting Details (zoom or hangouts link)
• Retrospective

[leonardpahlke]

Thanks for opening this proposal 🎉 I am very excited to see this.

I think the scope is fine if we limit it to GreenOps. IMO the WG should not be about anything tooling wise, just GreenOps scope. That's mentioned in the proposal, but I just want to highlight it 😄. I think the first task of the working group should be to define GreenOps to make the scope even clearer (which kinds of projects, practices, etc. are part of the WG).

[guidemetothemoon]

Very excited for this as well, also to the discussions that can come out of it! 😺
Totally agree with your clarification, Leo, it's good to keep it scoped to what the main goal of the WG is.

[eduardoriveror]

Great initiative. I am looking forward to meet and discuss more about this. I see GreenOps as an evolution of DevOps on the sustainability scope, an in line with Leo's comment, more than the tools, is the cultural shift and adoption of best practices.

[leonardpahlke]

@nikimanoledaki, @guidemetothemoon I have added some comments to the google docs file. I like the effort and I think this is an important and interesting topic for the TAG and the wider cloud native community. I think its awesome that you both are taking ownership here ❤️. Before we move on, we need to refine the proposal and the scope a bit more so that we are all on the same page and have a clear idea of where we want this to go. Depending on how the proposal is defined in the end (scope, deliverables, etc.), we might want to start this as a project first and not as a working group. As a project, this effort would be time-limited, i.e., until the deliverables are met, which might be a good fit here. But we can discuss this after we refined the proposal. Sounds good?

Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/18MkLryOSbZpSsgl_ileLbHp_K4xn8TqxMzcHDtNuY_o/edit#

[mkorbi]

Service Desk ticket opened for an account and hardware

[guidemetothemoon]

@leonardpahlke @mkorbi @nikimanoledaki this issue could probably be closed?

[leonardpahlke]

Yes! The WG Green Reviews is approved with this PR #151