Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ADD-01 MitigationConfirmed #8

Open
c4-bot-3 opened this issue Sep 14, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

ADD-01 MitigationConfirmed #8

c4-bot-3 opened this issue Sep 14, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
edited-by-warden mitigation-confirmed MR-ADD-01 satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards

Comments

@c4-bot-3
Copy link
Contributor

c4-bot-3 commented Sep 14, 2024

Pull Request

This PR is an additional change that is in scope for this review and the purpose of the PR is to make EasyAuction address a detail of the GnosisTrade plugin.

After checking the 33 modified files (most especially Broker.sol, Deployer.sol, and GnosisTrade.sol), imo this has been correctly done since all expected changes have been made, from function declarations to deploy scripts, now all consider the EasyAuction address as a detail of the GnosisTrade plugin.

Edit:

Per the request here, an additional review has been made for the newly deployed EasyAuction contract here.

Per the third line in the file:

// ==== From https://etherscan.io/address/0x0b7ffc1f4ad541a4ed16b40d8c37f0929158d101 ====

We can see how this contract is an upgrade to this, using a gist file we can see that the only differences introduced to this new file is in form of indention, spacing and reduction of lines, without any change in the contract logic, see this: https://gist.github.com/Bauchibred/179d264df1f5828312fc8be1c7c23192/revisions.

Asides the above there are no other changes, showcasing how there is no potential H/M mitigation to be made since the files were not changed, with the current file also, per my review there is no noteworthy issue.

c4-bot-8 added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2024
@c4-judge c4-judge added the satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards label Sep 18, 2024
@c4-judge
Copy link

thereksfour marked the issue as satisfactory

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
edited-by-warden mitigation-confirmed MR-ADD-01 satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants