You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
thinking about bids-validator config file which could change level of a specific type of a result. While reporting to the user it might be useful to instruct why any given record got to be like it is
in dandi-cli we associate each result with a singular
(I recall us working on refactoring to have standard and standard_version). So likely we would like to either add some explicit List[ConfigurationOrigin] construct depicting origin of the configuration (file, env var, ...) and then tools being able to annotating results with information about specific configuration file which effected that result. Thinking of the case where e.g. for openneuro there could be validator config provided by the dataset and then the one with overloads from openneuro.
User of the website then ATM just provided with a list of errors or warnings but there would be no specific description that e.g. error of having no subjects is specific to openneuro (its configuration for bids-validator, ref: OpenNeuroOrg/openneuro#3184), and not of dataset itself or the original standard.
thinking about bids-validator config file which could change level of a specific type of a result. While reporting to the user it might be useful to instruct why any given record got to be like it is
in dandi-cli we associate each result with a singular
(I recall us working on refactoring to have
standard
andstandard_version
). So likely we would like to either add some explicitList[ConfigurationOrigin]
construct depicting origin of the configuration (file, env var, ...) and then tools being able to annotating results with information about specific configuration file which effected that result. Thinking of the case where e.g. for openneuro there could be validator config provided by the dataset and then the one with overloads from openneuro.User of the website then ATM just provided with a list of errors or warnings but there would be no specific description that e.g. error of having no subjects is specific to openneuro (its configuration for bids-validator, ref: OpenNeuroOrg/openneuro#3184), and not of dataset itself or the original standard.
ref:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: