Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Organize votes in governance repo centrally #85

Open
4 tasks
jezdez opened this issue Feb 1, 2023 · 4 comments
Open
4 tasks

Organize votes in governance repo centrally #85

jezdez opened this issue Feb 1, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@jezdez
Copy link
Member

jezdez commented Feb 1, 2023

There was some discussion in the steering council chat room about record-keeping and discoverability of onging and past votes, since the they are becoming harder to track down.

As such @jakirkham and me are suggesting to do:

  • require votes to be submitted as PRs to a to-be-created votes directory in this repository
  • automatically request review from the steering council GitHub team via CODEOWNERS
  • automatically assign the https://github.com/conda-incubator/governance/labels/vote label
  • update the governance policy to mention the use of pull requests (which may trigger a governance policy change vote)

We also may want to look into if there is already a service that would provide automated vote reporting for standard votes (read: public ones).

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

Thanks for writing this up Jannis! 🙏

Something else we might consider is including the due dates for votes. Perhaps this could be done with a project. Toyed with this a bit here

@jezdez
Copy link
Member Author

jezdez commented Feb 1, 2023

Yeah, did you see see GitHub's new beta roadmaps? https://github.blog/changelog/2023-01-31-roadmap-in-projects-public-beta/

Playing with them here: https://github.com/orgs/conda/projects/15/views/4

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

Ooh that looks nice! Well timed too 😃

Yeah really like that idea 👍

@jezdez
Copy link
Member Author

jezdez commented Jun 5, 2024

Following another snafu of GitHub hiding the votes of some of the steering council members in #136 as spam (due to all being "yes"), it would seem to be useful to find a different mechanism for voting.

@ocefpaf suggested not to use PRs (as they increase the barrier of effort needed) and instead use an issue template form that would be filled when a vote is conducted (pre-setting the vote label, etc) and that would have a list of all steering council members as a check-list, so they can select yes, no or abstain easily.

@ocefpaf Is that what you had in mind?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants