Discussion: Choosing the Best Framework for FortiPath's Landing Page

[cywf]

Hello FortiPath Team,

As we look to revamp our landing page, we have several options on the table. Each of these frameworks and technologies has its own strengths and potential use cases. Let's discuss the pros and cons of each to determine the best fit for our needs:

1. Jekyll:

• Pros:

  • Integrated with GitHub Pages, allowing for easy deployment and hosting.
  • Uses the Liquid templating engine, which is straightforward and widely adopted.
  • Great for blogs and content-driven sites.

• Cons:

  • Written in Ruby, which might not be familiar to all team members.
  • Less dynamic than some JavaScript-based solutions.

---

2. NextJS:

• Pros:

  • Built on React, offering a rich set of components and libraries.
  • Supports server-side rendering, improving performance and SEO.
  • Highly modular and scalable.

• Cons:

  • Might be overkill for a simple landing page.
  • Requires a Node.js environment.

---

3. Gatsby:

• Pros:

  • Also built on React, with a focus on performance.
  • Generates static sites, ensuring fast load times.
  • Rich plugin ecosystem, including integrations with popular CMSs.

• Cons:

  • Steeper learning curve than some other static site generators.
  • Build times can increase as the site grows.

---

4. Hugo:

• Pros:

  • Extremely fast build times.
  • Written in Go, which is efficient and powerful.
  • Supports a wide range of content types out of the box.

• Cons:

  • Templating can be complex for those unfamiliar with Go.
  • Less dynamic capabilities compared to JavaScript-based solutions.

---

5. Static HTML:

• Pros:

  • Simple, lightweight, and universally supported.
  • No build process or dependencies required.
  • Maximum control over the structure and design.

• Cons:

  • Can become cumbersome for larger sites.
  • Lacks the advanced features and plugins of dedicated frameworks.

---

Discussion Points:

1. Which framework aligns best with our current technical expertise?
2. How dynamic and interactive do we want our landing page to be?
3. Are there any specific features or integrations we're aiming for that might sway our choice?
4. What are our considerations regarding SEO and performance?

Please share your thoughts and experiences with these options. Your insights will be invaluable in making an informed decision.

Best,
FortiPath Team