-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Microsoft support page needs improvement #12
Comments
One example of organizing the shortcodes is at List of LaTeX mathematical symbols as references in #11. Alternatively/additionally, the codes could be organized in the order in which they are typically learned. A fairly small number of symbols are frequently used. To learn more take a look at Improving Usability of Math Editors (link to Word document). |
A Word document with the symbols and codes is in draft at Short codes for Office Math Autocorrect (link to Word document). |
Adding the math autocomplete facility helps a lot since you don't need to know (or type) the complete control words. Tye it out by typing in https://murrayiii.github.io/UnicodeMathML/playground/. This facility is implemented in the Microsoft Office math facility in RichEdit and could be integrated into Word |
In github, there is an optional tab you can enable call discussions. Would it be a bad idea if we separated out items like this into the discussion section? That section opperates like a threaded forum that people can continue to contribute to, and it would leave the issues section as true issues/bugs/feature requests. |
Oh, interesting. We should discuss that today!
From: Jason Khurdan ***@***.***>
Date: Monday, August 19, 2024 at 8:34 AM
To: daisy/math-a11y ***@***.***>
Cc: Subscribed ***@***.***>
Subject: [External] Re: [daisy/math-a11y] Microsoft support page on needs improvement (Issue #12)
This message was sent from a non-IU address. Please exercise caution when clicking links or opening attachments from external sources.
In github, there is an optional tab you can enable call discussions. Would it be a bad idea if we separated out items like this into the discussion section? That section opperates like a threaded forum that people can continue to contribute to, and it would leave the issues section as true issues/bugs/feature requests.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#12 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAA4WLV7MWNYCR4WNTQWWY3ZSHQ4FAVCNFSM6AAAAABMQ3KRVGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDEOJWGQ3DMOBWGU>.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
I verified this issue. Our group is looking for the MS team to improve the documentation available for codes needed to write various expressions. We understand there may be an auto-complete option but with out knowing the first few letters of the syntax this has proven to have varying degrees of reliability. Some suggestions on how to organize this information was to do so by subject area (i.e Algebra, Geometry, etc) and ensuring someone could use a Ctrl F (find function) to find it via text displayed on the screen associated with the element. |
|
eDAD tracking ticket for this issue is Accessibility 228269 and possibly updated to Accessibility 228601
Math AutoCorrect in Word has many codes for creating math expressions from the keyboard but looking these up is challenging. One of the few places to find the codes is in a table on the page Linear format equations using UnicodeMath and LaTeX in Word.
Areas for improvement:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: