Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Different sims obtained when using different number of MPI nodes #28

Open
andreufont opened this issue Dec 11, 2017 · 7 comments
Open

Comments

@andreufont
Copy link
Contributor

I get different simulations when I use the same seed, but different number of MPI nodes.

Is this a bug, or a well known feature?

I found this while investigating issue #25 on quasars with Dec=NaN, since I got different number of bad Dec when using MPI and not using it.

@damonge
Copy link
Owner

damonge commented Dec 21, 2017

@andreufont Yes, this is to be expected. The seeding happens differently depending on the number of nodes. Is this a problem?

@andreufont
Copy link
Contributor Author

@damonge - no, not really. In general is nice when you get the same answer regardless of OpenMP / MPI setting, but as long as it is documented, this should not be an issue.
I just though it was a potential bug that could be related to some of the other issues, but we can close this issue.

@damonge
Copy link
Owner

damonge commented Dec 21, 2017

OK, thanks. I'll leave all issues open for the time being until we find the reason for the NaNs.

@andreufont
Copy link
Contributor Author

Should we also close this one?

@damonge
Copy link
Owner

damonge commented Dec 21, 2017

Let's leave it open in case someone else encounters this "issue"

@Laura-Casas
Copy link

@cramirezpe - mira lo que me ha enseñado @andreufont

@cramirezpe
Copy link
Collaborator

@Laura-Casas, thanks for reminding this... I was aware but at some point, I forgot it.

@cramirezpe cramirezpe reopened this Dec 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants