-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Support multiple rooftops ? #13
Comments
Hi Bruce, I am currently busy with a wast colleaction schedule integration, thus do not have time for the solcast integration right now. |
No problem. So can two sessions of your integration be added in it’s current form. |
As a temporary fix, I've made a copy of thecustom component under the domain "solcastx" and that way I can run two separate instances and add them together. |
These instructions were helpful in creating a duplicate component: https://community.home-assistant.io/t/how-can-i-create-a-custom-component-by-copying-another/120455 |
Yes, that's pretty much what I did. Thanks |
thanks for this - worked for me |
This was the template sensor I created to combine the two separate estimates, and the gauge. Does anyone know how to include the "Tomorrow" and "The day after tomorrow" attributes?
|
It would be........
|
I want to say: great stuff that you already did this. I have an east-west solar configuration on my roof and use two sites for it in Solcast. I would like to add them together and also limit them to the max output of my inverter (I know the Python math for that :)) I have copied the "solcast" custom component folder and renamed it "solcastx", I have also changed the latter manifest.json.
However, upon adding an entity in the dashboard, it only sees "sensor.solcast_forecast" entity but not the "x" variants. What am I doing wrong? EDIT: |
There's a bit more to it than that. https://github.com/B-Hartley/bruces_homeassistant_config/tree/main/custom_components/solcastx Strangely, I'm not acutally using it, as my tuned rooftop is still working and still tuning. So I haven't had the need to switch to the split rooftop setup. |
As SolCast are stopping tuning, they are offering up to two rooftops per accounts to allow for split arrays.
How difficult would it be for your component to take two RoofTop IDs, get forecasts for both and add them together?
Or to allow you component to be setup twice with different info, I could then add it together myself.
Thanks,
Bruce.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: