Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can mosaics scale to that many assets? #1

Open
jabo38 opened this issue Feb 4, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Can mosaics scale to that many assets? #1

jabo38 opened this issue Feb 4, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@jabo38
Copy link

jabo38 commented Feb 4, 2019

Need to make sure that it is scalable. One of the reason's I made Apostille in the first place is it was too heavy on the system to create mosaic for each asset. I always wanted a second class citizen mosaic called a "singleton mosaic". This is a mosaic with a non-divisible quantity of 1 and it the mosaic contract is non-mutable.

Additional comments.

Not a problem: I think in Catapult you can maybe make a mosaic with no namespace now.

Disadvantage: The person that has the private key for the Apostille account could update or change the data, and the person that has the mosaic once it is transferred cannot. Whereas with Metadata on the Apostille account can be edited by the owner of the Apostille account.

@daoka daoka added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Feb 12, 2019
@daoka
Copy link
Owner

daoka commented Feb 12, 2019

Thank you for feedback.

Although this method is expensive at NIS 1, I think that it can be a little cheaper at Catapult.

I wanted to link mosaic and apostille in an auditable.

Raccoon wallet provides the function called mosaic gallery.
The mosaic gallery links mosaics with uploaded images in OpenApostille.
However, there was a problem that anyone could link a mosaic and image when Apostille 's TxHash was known.

The image associated with the Apostille mosaic is used for greeting tokens and so on.

Not to replace the method using multi-sig. I would like to propose this method as the third method.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants
@daoka @jabo38 and others