I didn't do a lot, a datastore and a 3 http endpoint but I feel like a re-wrote them 1 billion times

[pbiggar]

A user says:

There are many positive things to say and the technology is definitively promising, but, the inglorious but, the website ux is really hindering.
Don't get me wrong, I can see there is a lot of work behind it but I was really frustrated by the code edition.

At many occasion, the editor will lock the edition, letting me no choice than starting again writing the line from the start . And given the functional nature of the language, the line can be a long chain.

Or beware of not always starting with a let. Cause if you discover that you couldn't chain with |> because the returning value isn't the first parameter of the next function, you'll have the delete all again.

Or if I accidentally delete a let, the whole instruction is deleted.

I didn't do a lot, a datastore and a 3 http endpoint but I feel like a re-wrote them 1 billion times. while a less intrusive editor would have allowed a far better experience.

I really wish for a simple text editor that let me edit where I want, adding new line where I want and rewrite some part without deleting the instructions after.

I also feel claustrophobic in that small block.

To put in the nutshell, the technology behind is great, but I would feel far more comfortable with fill size tabs of text editor. The dashboard is nice looking, get you the Wow effect, but it doesn't work when actually using it for real work. (Oh, and click-drag should enable panning)

Finally, what are you offering for versioning? Given that I feel the editor is working against me, once it works, I'm really afraid to even edit the code and lose work even though I want to.