You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Up to now, all variant name forms in the GND have been output using the datatype property #variantNameForThePerson. In contrast to the implementation for "Relationships to persons", the relationship code is currently not evaluated for "Alternative name". This means that, among other things, the information as to whether a variant name form is a pseudonym is not transported. This information available in the data should be output in future.
Up to now, all variant name forms in the GND have been output using the datatype property #variantNameForThePerson. In contrast to the implementation for "Relationships to persons", the relationship code is currently not evaluated for "Alternative name". This means that, among other things, the information as to whether a variant name form is a pseudonym is not transported. This information available in the data should be output in future.
I therefore propose the following addtions
Datatype Properties
Examples
Current:
Should be:
Comments and suggestions are very welcome!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: