Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
80 lines (63 loc) · 4.55 KB

0044-witness-decay.md

File metadata and controls

80 lines (63 loc) · 4.55 KB
Raw

HIP-44: Witness Reward Decay

Summary and Motivation

As Proof-of-Coverage continues to be improved, the community has proposed several improvements to continue to incentivize wide rollout of new Helium Hotspot coverage while addressing over-rewarding due to density and or arbitrage. One effective way to address over-rewarding is to create soft limits on witness earnings through decaying witness reward units.

Stakeholders

All Hotspot owners are affected by this proposal. Specifically, those with extremely high witness rates per epoch would be most affected and rewards would be more evenly distributed to other Hotspots that are witnessing within those epochs. Other network participants (Validators, Routers, etc.) are not affected.

Detailed Explanation

Witness reward decay rates provide a soft economic limit to over-witnessing. As the number of witness events per epoch increases, a Hotspot will gain subsequently fewer reward units for each event.

This decay rate can be defined as a chain variable and modified over time. The initial proposal for witness_reward_decay_rate is 0.08 which can be modified over time as the impact is understood. In addition, a witness_reward_decay_exclusion of 4, also a chain variable, would be used to only affect witness rewards at and above the value. Practically speaking this could be seen as the following.

1> f(DecayRate), f(Exclusion), DecayRate = 0.08, Exclusion = 4, lists:sum([ case Count < Exclusion of true -> 1; _ -> math:exp((Count - Exclusion) * -1 * DecayRate) end || Count <- lists:seq(1, 20)]).
12.668364965907838
2> f(DecayRate), f(Exclusion), DecayRate = 0.08, Exclusion = 4, lists:sum([ case Count < Exclusion of true -> 1; _ -> math:exp((Count - Exclusion) * -1 * DecayRate) end || Count <- lists:seq(1, 15)]).
11.02650609098551
3> f(DecayRate), f(Exclusion), DecayRate = 0.08, Exclusion = 4, lists:sum([ case Count < Exclusion of true -> 1; _ -> math:exp((Count - Exclusion) * -1 * DecayRate) end || Count <- lists:seq(1, 10)]).
8.577140471334872
4> f(DecayRate), f(Exclusion), DecayRate = 0.08, Exclusion = 4, lists:sum([ case Count < Exclusion of true -> 1; _ -> math:exp((Count - Exclusion) * -1 * DecayRate) end || Count <- lists:seq(1, 5)]).
4.923116346386636
5> f(DecayRate), f(Exclusion), DecayRate = 0.08, Exclusion = 4, lists:sum([ case Count < Exclusion of true -> 1; _ -> math:exp((Count - Exclusion) * -1 * DecayRate) end || Count <- lists:seq(1, 4)]).
4.0
6> f(DecayRate), f(Exclusion), DecayRate = 0.08, Exclusion = 4, lists:sum([ case Count < Exclusion of true -> 1; _ -> math:exp((Count - Exclusion) * -1 * DecayRate) end || Count <- lists:seq(1, 3)]).
3
7> f(DecayRate), f(Exclusion), DecayRate = 0.08, Exclusion = 4, lists:sum([ case Count < Exclusion of true -> 1; _ -> math:exp((Count - Exclusion) * -1 * DecayRate) end || Count <- lists:seq(1, 2)]).
2
8> f(DecayRate), f(Exclusion), DecayRate = 0.08, Exclusion = 4, lists:sum([ case Count < Exclusion of true -> 1; _ -> math:exp((Count - Exclusion) * -1 * DecayRate) end || Count <- lists:seq(1, 1)]).
1

At 20 witness events, the Hotspot would only be eligible for 12.66 reward units (assuming no other scaling) but at 5 witness events, the Hotspot would be eligible for almost the full amount of reward units (4.92). No decay occurs up to 4 events.

Seen differently across the network, 5% of the network would be scaled by almost 92% on their witnesses and this would incentivize the remainder of the network to grow and expand organically. This is based on analysis of all witness receipts between blocks 1032738 and 1040915. data

population-graph focused-population-graph

The fortunate coincidence about this feature is that it's already built and is just two chain variable away from being activated. We are able to enable it at the same time as PoCv11 is activated (or sooner).

Open Questions

  • Are these proposed values the correct starting
  • How do we verify that the proposed limits are right for the network?
  • How could these limits be adjusted in the future?

Success Metrics

Success here means that a Hotspot witnessing provides sufficient data to the blockchain to reward coverage and incentives continue to be aligned to create new and wide coverage on the Helium network.