You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Description
When calculating PDF using the structures created from ICSD .cif files, there exist some structures that produce PDF with nonphysical high peak at very low r. It was suspected that the structure instances are not constructed as intended, and by investigating using PDFgui there indeed exist multiple instances of the same atom at very close locations. The created structures also have different composition comparing to the .cif file description.
To Reproduce
There are many .cif files from ICSD that can reproduce this issue, for example we can use icsd_236635.cif (Europium Silver Aluminide (1/2.5/2.5)). Using PDFgui we can see the list of generated atoms. Here is what I get using the example file:
.
Expected behavior
We know the composition is (1/2.5/2.5), so the expected list of atom should be something like: .
Guess
This problem could be caused by errors in parsing error or applying symmetry operations.
Related
Similar but different problem could be found in files such as icsd_059683.cif:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
When calculating PDF using the structures created from ICSD
.cif
files, there exist some structures that produce PDF with nonphysical high peak at very low r. It was suspected that the structure instances are not constructed as intended, and by investigating usingPDFgui
there indeed exist multiple instances of the same atom at very close locations. The created structures also have different composition comparing to the.cif
file description.To Reproduce
There are many
.cif
files from ICSD that can reproduce this issue, for example we can useicsd_236635.cif
(Europium Silver Aluminide (1/2.5/2.5)). UsingPDFgui
we can see the list of generated atoms. Here is what I get using the example file:.
Expected behavior
We know the composition is (1/2.5/2.5), so the expected list of atom should be something like:
.
Guess
This problem could be caused by errors in parsing error or applying symmetry operations.
Related
Similar but different problem could be found in files such as
icsd_059683.cif
:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: