You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 2, 2024. It is now read-only.
What started as a quick fix for us using Pydantic to help us validate our frontmatter files has grown a bit unwieldy.
In our bin/*.py folder we have a bunch of scripts that help us organize and run our conference. Several include copies of the same BaseModel but we never got around to trying to refactor these to work off of the same models.
A quick win would be to refactor some of these files to reference the same set of BaseModels.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'd recommend using the process.py models. When I was implementing the integrations for the online platform, those seemed to be the most complete and what I re-used.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
What started as a quick fix for us using Pydantic to help us validate our frontmatter files has grown a bit unwieldy.
In our bin/*.py folder we have a bunch of scripts that help us organize and run our conference. Several include copies of the same
BaseModel
but we never got around to trying to refactor these to work off of the same models.A quick win would be to refactor some of these files to reference the same set of BaseModels.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: