-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
Description
Hi,
Thanks for providing the Freebase RDF dump and Virtuoso setup — it's been very useful for restoring SPARQL access to Freebase data.
While exploring the RDF graph, I noticed that many relations (properties) and classes (types) — such as film.actor.film, people.person, or location.location — do not have any common.topic.description triples, even though they did have English descriptions in the original Freebase interface.
For example, this query:
PREFIX ns: <http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/>
SELECT ?description WHERE {
ns:film.actor.film ns:common.topic.description ?description .
FILTER (lang(?description) = "en")
}
...returns nothing, and the same applies to other widely used classes like people.person.
This makes it difficult to retrieve human-readable documentation for the meaning and purpose of relations or classes, which is crucial for understanding Freebase’s schema.
Could you clarify:
Were common.topic.description values for types and properties excluded intentionally?
Or might they have been dropped during RDF preprocessing?
Is there a version of the dump that retains this metadata?
Best regards,
karou