Employment.bib

@MISC{Holmes2011,
  AUTHOR =       {Holmes, E. and Oakley, M.},
  TITLE =        {Public and private sector terms, conditions and the issue of fairness},
  institution =  {Policy Exchange},
  YEAR =         {2011},
}

@MISC{IDS2011,
    TITLE  =   {Public and Private Sector Earnings: Fact and Fiction},
    author = {{Income Data Services}},
    institution = {Income Data Services},
    year = {2011},
}

@ARTICLE{Nickell2002,
    author = {Nickell, Stephen and Quintini, Glenda},
    year = 2002,
    title = {The Consequences Of The Decline In Public Sector Pay In {B}ritain: A Little Bit Of Evidence},
    journal = {The Economic Journal},
    volume = 112,
    pages = {107--118}
}

@MISC{Disney2008,
    author = {Disney, Richard and Gosling, Amanda},
    year = 2008,
    title = {Changing public sector wage differentials in the {UK}},
    howpublished = {Institute for Fiscal Studies Working Paper 08/02},
    source = {http://www.ifs.org.uk/wps/wp0802.pdf}
}

@article {Postel2007,
author = {Postel-Vinay, Fabien and Turon, H\'{e}l\`{e}ne},
title = {The Public Pay Gap in {B}ritain: Small Differences That (Don't?) Matter},
journal = {The Economic Journal},
volume = {117},
number = {523},
publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Ltd},
issn = {1468-0297},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02091.x},
doi = {10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02091.x},
pages = {1460--1503},
year = {2007},
abstract = {The existing literature on inequality between private and public
sectors focuses on cross-section differences in earnings levels.
Forward-looking agents, however, care about income and job mobility too,
which we show are substantially different between the two sectors. Using data
from the BHPS, we estimate a model of income and employment dynamics,
allowing for unobserved heterogeneity in the propensity to be employed in
either job sector. We detect a positive average public premium both in income
flows and in the present discounted sum of future income flows. We also find
that income inequality is lower but more persistent in the public sector.},
}

@article{Hundley1991,
	author = {Hundley, Greg},
	title = {Public- and Private-Sector Occupational Pay Structures},
	journal = {Industrial Relations},
	year = 1991,
	volume = 30,
	pages = {417--434},
	abstract = {Data from a representative  sample  of  wage and salary  workers are
used  to estimate wage equations that provide for direct estimates of
the  differences  between public  and private  occupational pay struc-
tures.  The results show that at the state and  local levels of  govern-
ment in particular,  the publiciprivate  wage differential  tends to de-
cline as occupational skill requirements  increase.  Public employees
who  work  on jobs  unique  to  the  public  sector  are paid  a  wage
premium.  There is  little support for the  idea  that  degree  of  union
coverage in the private sector affects public wages for an occupation.}
}

@MISC{Chatterji2007,
	author = {Chatterji, Monojit and Mumford, Karen},
	title = {Public-Private Sector Wage Gaps for {B}ritish Full-Time Male Employees: Across Occupations and Workplaces},
	year = 2007,
	institution = {Office of Manpower Economics},
    url={http://bit.ly/HievoT}
}

@article{Luciflora2006,
	author = {Luciflora, C. and Meurs, D.},
	title = {The Public Sector Pay Gap in {F}rance, {G}reat {B}ritain and {I}taly},
	journal = {Review of Income and Wealth},
	year = 2006,
	volume = 52,
	pages = {43--59},
}

@article{Yu2005,
	author = {Yu, K. and Vam Kerm, P. and Zhang, J.},
	title = {Bayesian Quantile Regression: An Application to the Wage Distribution in 1990s {B}ritain},
	journal = {The Indian Journal of Statistics},
	year = 2005,
	volume = 67,
	pages = {359--377},
}

@MISC{OME2012,
  author =       {{Office of Manpower Economics}},
  title =        {Government Evidence to the Pay Review Bodies: Economics of Local Pay},
  institution =  {Office of Manpower Economics},
  year =         {2012},
  url = {http://bit.ly/GNkyEA}
}

@MISC{Damant2011,
    author={Damant, Andrew and Jenkins, Jamie},
    title={Estimating differences in public and private sector pay},
    year = 2011,
    institution = {Office for National Statistics},
    url = {http://bit.ly/GSeMNe}
}

@MISC{SOC2000,
    author={{Office for National Statistics}},
    title = {About the {S}tandard {O}ccupational {C}lassification 2000 ({SOC} 2000)},
    url = {http://bit.ly/GNq6il },
    year = 2012
}

@article{1998,
     jstor_articletype = {editorial},
     title = {Editorial: The Economic and Social Research Council Review of Government Social Classifications},
     author = {Rose, David and O'Reilly, Karen},
     journal = {Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society)},
     jstor_issuetitle = {},
     volume = {161},
     number = {1},
     jstor_formatteddate = {1998},
     pages = {pp. 2-4},
     url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/2983550},
     ISSN = {09641998},
     abstract = {},
     language = {English},
     year = {1998},
     publisher = {Blackwell Publishing for the Royal Statistical Society},
     copyright = {Copyright © 1998 Royal Statistical Society},
}

@MANUAL{Taylor2010,
  title =        {British {H}ousehold {P}anel {S}urvey User Manual Volume {A}: Introduction, Technical Report and Appendices},
  author =       {Taylor, Marcia Freed and Brice, John and Buck, Nick and Prentice-Lane, Elaine},
  organization = {University of Essex},
  address =      {Colchester},
  year =         {2010},
}

@MISC{ONSnd,
  author =       {{Office for National Statistics}},
  title =        {Continuity issues: {SC}, {SEG} and {NS-SEC}},
  year =         {2012},
  url = {http://bit.ly/HdkMpf},
  note = "[Accessed 28 March 2012]"
}

 @Manual{R2011,
       title        = {R: A Language and Environment for Statistical
                       Computing},
       author       = {{R Development Core Team}},
       organization = {R Foundation for Statistical Computing},
       address      = {Vienna, Austria},
       year         = 2011,
       note         = {{ISBN} 3-900051-07-0},
       url          = {http://www.R-project.org}
     }

  @Manual{lme2011,
    title = {lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes},
    author = {Bates, Douglas and  Maechler, Martin and Bolker, Ben},
    year = {2011},
    note = {R package version 0.999375-42},
    url = {http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4},
  }

@article{Boal1997,
    title = {Monopsony  in  the  labor  market},
    author = {Boal, W. and Ransom, M.},
    journal = {Journal of Economic Literature},
    year = 1997,
    volume = 35,
    pages = {86--112}
}

@article {Barron2012,
author = {Barron, David N. and West, Elizabeth},
title = {The Financial Costs of Caring in the British Labour Market: Is There a Wage Penalty for Workers in Caring Occupations?},
journal = {British Journal of Industrial Relations},
publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Ltd},
issn = {1467-8543},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2011.00884.x},
doi = {10.1111/j.1467-8543.2011.00884.x},
pages = {no--no},
year = {2012},
}

@article{Byron2010,
    journal = {Work and Occupations},
    volume = 37,
    pages = {435--475},
    year = 2010,
    title = {Discrimination, Complexity, and the Public/Private Sector Question},
    author = {Byron, Reginald A.},
    abstract = {Does employment discrimination vary in degree or character across public
and private labor market sectors? Prior research cannot fully address this
question because it typically relies on one dimension of discrimination—
estimates of wage gaps. This study extends the literature by analyzing 11,528
legally verified cases of race and sex discrimination from the Ohio Civil
Rights Commission (1986-2003). Quantitative analyses demonstrate that
aggregate rates of verified discrimination vary little by sector, yet there are
elevated rates of public sector promotion discrimination and elevated rates
of private sector firing discrimination. In-depth qualitative analyses show
that specific sectoral processes contribute to these aggregate patterns. In
the public sector, limited accountability for promotion decisions allows
managers to devalue seniority, augment “soft skills,” and sabotage multiple
stages of formalized proceedings. Moreover, the very devices intended to
curb discriminatory promotion may inadvertently multiply the stages for
bias to enter decisions. In the private sector, managers exploit the latitude
afforded by the employment-at-will doctrine to differentially terminate
workers, sometimes justifying their actions as cost saving in a competitive
market. The author argues that these processes are in line with statistical
discrimination and social closure theories and concludes by discussing their
implications for understandings of workplace inequality.},
    doi = {10.1177/0730888410380152}
}

@article{Kaufman2002,
    title = { Assessing alternative perspectives on race and sex employment segregation},
    author = {Kaufman, R.L.},
    journal = {American Sociological Review},
    volume = 67,
    pages = {547--572},
    year = 2002
}

@article{Baron2007,
    title = {In the company of women: Gender inequality and the logic of bureaucracy in start-up firms},
    author = {Baron, J. N. and Hannan, M. T. and Hsu, G. and Kocak, O.},
    journal = {Work and Occupations},
    volume = 34,
    year = 2007,
    pages = {35--66}
}

@book{Becker1971,
    title = {The Economics of Discrimination},
    author = {Becker, Gary S.},
    year = 1971,
    publisher = {University of Chicago Press},
    address = {Chicago}
}

@misc{ONSSEC,
    title = "The {N}ational {S}tatistics Socio-economic Classification",
    author = "{Office for National Statistics}",
    url = {http://bit.ly/NDGKPy},
    note = "[Online; accessed 8 August 2012]",
    year = {2012},
}

@misc{BIS2012,
    title = "Trade Union Membership 2011",
    author = "Nikki Brownlie",
    year = 2012,
    publisher = "Department for Business, Innovation and Skills",
    url = {http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/employment-matters/docs/t/12-p77-trade-union-membership-2011.pdf},
    note = "[Online; accessed 10 September 2012]"
}