You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As you can see in the attached images, the documentation for "record struct" includes IEquatable in the implemented interfaces. But this is an implicit interface
I would prefer that the snippet just shows public record struct MyStruct, which matches the code I wrote. I also want to remove it from the "Implements" section.
Is this something you would do in a post-transform extension, or is there a better way to accomplish it?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
As you can see in the attached images, the documentation for "record struct" includes
IEquatable
in the implemented interfaces. But this is an implicit interfaceI would prefer that the snippet just shows
public record struct MyStruct
, which matches the code I wrote. I also want to remove it from the "Implements" section.Is this something you would do in a post-transform extension, or is there a better way to accomplish it?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions