-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
readings.bib
259 lines (227 loc) · 17.1 KB
/
readings.bib
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
@article{costanza_value_1997,
title = {The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital},
volume = {387},
copyright = {© 1997 Nature Publishing Group},
issn = {0028-0836},
url = {http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v387/n6630/full/387253a0.html},
doi = {10.1038/387253a0},
abstract = {Nature is the international weekly journal of science: a magazine style journal that publishes full-length research papers in all disciplines of science, as well as News and Views, reviews, news, features, commentaries, web focuses and more, covering all branches of science and how science impacts upon all aspects of society and life.},
language = {en},
number = {6630},
urldate = {2013-06-25},
journal = {Nature},
author = {Costanza, Robert and d'Arge, Ralph and de Groot, Rudolf and Farber, Stephen and Grasso, Monica and Hannon, Bruce and Limburg, Karin and Naeem, Shahid and O'Neill, Robert V. and Paruelo, Jose and Raskin, Robert G. and Sutton, Paul and van den Belt, Marjan},
month = may,
year = {1997},
keywords = {DNA, Development, Nature, RNA, astronomy, astrophysics, biochemistry, bioinformatics, biology, biotechnology, cancer, cell cycle, cell signalling., climate change, computational biology, developmental biology, drug discovery, earth science, ecology, environmental science, evolution, evolutionary biology, functional genomics, genetics, genomics, geophysics, immunology, interdisciplinary science, life, marine biology, materials science, medical research, medicine, metabolomics, molecular biology, molecular interactions, nanotechnology, neurobiology, neuroscience, palaeobiology, pharmacology, physics, proteomics, quantum physics, science, science news, science policy, signal transduction, structural biology, systems biology, transcriptomics},
pages = {253--260},
}
@article{bullard_solid_1983,
title = {Solid {Waste} {Sites} and the {Black} {Houston} {Community}*},
volume = {53},
issn = {1475-682X},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1983.tb00037.x},
doi = {10.1111/j.1475-682X.1983.tb00037.x},
abstract = {This paper presents data on the siting of solid waste facilities in one of the nation's fastest growing cities, Houston, Texas. The findings reveal that solid waste sites were not randomly scattered over the Houston landscape but were likely to be found in predominantly black neighborhoods and near black schools. Institutionalized discrimination in the housing market, lack of zoning, and decisions by public officials over the past fifty years are major factors that have contributed to Houston's black neighborhoods becoming the “dumping ground” for the area's solid waste.},
language = {en},
number = {2-3},
urldate = {2024-05-02},
journal = {Sociological Inquiry},
author = {Bullard, Robert D.},
year = {1983},
pages = {273--288},
}
@article{leek_five_2017,
title = {Five ways to fix statistics},
volume = {551},
copyright = {2021 Nature},
url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-017-07522-z},
doi = {10.1038/d41586-017-07522-z},
abstract = {As debate rumbles on about how and how much poor statistics is to blame for poor reproducibility, Nature asked influential statisticians to recommend one change to improve science. The common theme? The problem is not our maths, but ourselves.},
language = {en},
number = {7682},
urldate = {2024-04-25},
journal = {Nature},
author = {Leek, Jeff and McShane, Blakeley B. and Gelman, Andrew and Colquhoun, David and Nuijten, Michèle B. and Goodman, Steven N.},
month = nov,
year = {2017},
keywords = {Lab life, Mathematics and computing, Research data},
pages = {557--559},
}
@article{benjamin_redefine_2018,
title = {Redefine statistical significance},
volume = {2},
copyright = {2017 The Author(s)},
issn = {2397-3374},
url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-017-0189-z},
doi = {10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z},
abstract = {We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 for claims of new discoveries.},
language = {en},
number = {1},
urldate = {2024-04-25},
journal = {Nature Human Behaviour},
author = {Benjamin, Daniel J. and Berger, James O. and Johannesson, Magnus and Nosek, Brian A. and Wagenmakers, E.-J. and Berk, Richard and Bollen, Kenneth A. and Brembs, Björn and Brown, Lawrence and Camerer, Colin and Cesarini, David and Chambers, Christopher D. and Clyde, Merlise and Cook, Thomas D. and De Boeck, Paul and Dienes, Zoltan and Dreber, Anna and Easwaran, Kenny and Efferson, Charles and Fehr, Ernst and Fidler, Fiona and Field, Andy P. and Forster, Malcolm and George, Edward I. and Gonzalez, Richard and Goodman, Steven and Green, Edwin and Green, Donald P. and Greenwald, Anthony G. and Hadfield, Jarrod D. and Hedges, Larry V. and Held, Leonhard and Hua Ho, Teck and Hoijtink, Herbert and Hruschka, Daniel J. and Imai, Kosuke and Imbens, Guido and Ioannidis, John P. A. and Jeon, Minjeong and Jones, James Holland and Kirchler, Michael and Laibson, David and List, John and Little, Roderick and Lupia, Arthur and Machery, Edouard and Maxwell, Scott E. and McCarthy, Michael and Moore, Don A. and Morgan, Stephen L. and Munafó, Marcus and Nakagawa, Shinichi and Nyhan, Brendan and Parker, Timothy H. and Pericchi, Luis and Perugini, Marco and Rouder, Jeff and Rousseau, Judith and Savalei, Victoria and Schönbrodt, Felix D. and Sellke, Thomas and Sinclair, Betsy and Tingley, Dustin and Van Zandt, Trisha and Vazire, Simine and Watts, Duncan J. and Winship, Christopher and Wolpert, Robert L. and Xie, Yu and Young, Cristobal and Zinman, Jonathan and Johnson, Valen E.},
month = jan,
year = {2018},
note = {Publisher: Nature Publishing Group},
keywords = {Human behaviour, Statistics},
pages = {6--10},
}
@article{dodds_temporal_2011,
title = {Temporal {Patterns} of {Happiness} and {Information} in a {Global} {Social} {Network}: {Hedonometrics} and {Twitter}},
volume = {6},
issn = {1932-6203},
shorttitle = {Temporal {Patterns} of {Happiness} and {Information} in a {Global} {Social} {Network}},
url = {https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0026752},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0026752},
abstract = {Individual happiness is a fundamental societal metric. Normally measured through self-report, happiness has often been indirectly characterized and overshadowed by more readily quantifiable economic indicators such as gross domestic product. Here, we examine expressions made on the online, global microblog and social networking service Twitter, uncovering and explaining temporal variations in happiness and information levels over timescales ranging from hours to years. Our data set comprises over 46 billion words contained in nearly 4.6 billion expressions posted over a 33 month span by over 63 million unique users. In measuring happiness, we construct a tunable, real-time, remote-sensing, and non-invasive, text-based hedonometer. In building our metric, made available with this paper, we conducted a survey to obtain happiness evaluations of over 10,000 individual words, representing a tenfold size improvement over similar existing word sets. Rather than being ad hoc, our word list is chosen solely by frequency of usage, and we show how a highly robust and tunable metric can be constructed and defended.},
language = {en},
number = {12},
urldate = {2024-04-25},
journal = {PLOS ONE},
author = {Dodds, Peter Sheridan and Harris, Kameron Decker and Kloumann, Isabel M. and Bliss, Catherine A. and Danforth, Christopher M.},
month = dec,
year = {2011},
note = {Publisher: Public Library of Science},
keywords = {Emotions, Facial expressions, Happiness, Language, Measurement, Semantics, Social networks, Twitter},
pages = {e26752},
}
@article{clarke_1944_2006,
title = {The 1944 patulin trial of the {British} {Medical} {Research} {Council}},
volume = {99},
issn = {0141-0768},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680609900923},
doi = {10.1177/014107680609900923},
abstract = {Additional material for this article is available from the James Lind Library website [http://www.jameslindlibrary.org] where this paper was previously published.},
language = {en},
number = {9},
urldate = {2024-04-13},
journal = {Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine},
author = {Clarke, Mike},
month = sep,
year = {2006},
note = {Publisher: SAGE Publications},
pages = {478--480},
}
@article{trohler_lind_2005,
title = {Lind and scurvy: 1747 to 1795},
volume = {98},
issn = {0141-0768},
shorttitle = {Lind and scurvy},
url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1276007/},
number = {11},
urldate = {2024-04-13},
journal = {Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine},
author = {Tröhler, U},
month = nov,
year = {2005},
pmid = {16260808},
pmcid = {PMC1276007},
pages = {519--522},
}
@book{gertler_impact_2016,
address = {Washington, DC},
title = {Impact {Evaluation} in {Practice}, {Second} {Edition}},
copyright = {http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/},
isbn = {978-1-4648-0779-4},
url = {https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/25030},
abstract = {The second edition of the Impact Evaluation in Practice handbook is a comprehensive and accessible introduction to impact evaluation for policy makers and development practitioners. First published in 2011, it has been used widely across the development and academic communities. The book incorporates real-world examples to present practical guidelines for designing and implementing impact evaluations. Readers will gain an understanding of impact evaluations and the best ways to use them to design evidence-based policies and programs. The updated version covers the newest techniques for evaluating programs and includes state-of-the-art implementation advice, as well as an expanded set of examples and case studies that draw on recent development challenges. It also includes new material on research ethics and partnerships to conduct impact evaluation. The handbook is divided into four sections: Part One discusses what to evaluate and why; Part Two presents the main impact evaluation methods; Part Three addresses how to manage impact evaluations; Part Four reviews impact evaluation sampling and data collection. Case studies illustrate different applications of impact evaluations. The book links to complementary instructional material available online, including an applied case as well as questions and answers. The updated second edition will be a valuable resource for the international development community, universities, and policy makers looking to build better evidence around what works in development.},
language = {en\_US},
urldate = {2023-01-29},
publisher = {World Bank},
author = {Gertler, Paul J. and Martinez, Sebastian and Premand, Patrick and Rawlings, Laura B. and Vermeersch, Christel M. J.},
month = sep,
year = {2016},
doi = {10.1596/978-1-4648-0779-4},
}
@article{chen_evidence_2013,
title = {Evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from {China}’s {Huai} {River} policy},
issn = {0027-8424, 1091-6490},
url = {http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/07/03/1300018110},
doi = {10.1073/pnas.1300018110},
language = {en},
urldate = {2013-07-08},
journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences},
author = {Chen, Yuyu and Ebenstein, Avraham and Greenstone, Michael and Li, Hongbin},
month = jul,
year = {2013},
}
@article{dell_nation_2018,
title = {Nation {Building} {Through} {Foreign} {Intervention}: {Evidence} from {Discontinuities} in {Military} {Strategies}},
volume = {133},
issn = {0033-5533},
shorttitle = {Nation {Building} {Through} {Foreign} {Intervention}},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx037},
doi = {10.1093/qje/qjx037},
abstract = {This study uses discontinuities in U.S. strategies employed during the Vietnam War to estimate their causal impacts. It identifies the effects of bombing by exploiting rounding thresholds in an algorithm used to target air strikes. Bombing increased the military and political activities of the communist insurgency, weakened local governance, and reduced noncommunist civic engagement. The study also exploits a spatial discontinuity across neighboring military regions that pursued different counterinsurgency strategies. A strategy emphasizing overwhelming firepower plausibly increased insurgent attacks and worsened attitudes toward the U.S. and South Vietnamese government, relative to a more hearts-and-minds-oriented approach.},
number = {2},
urldate = {2024-03-19},
journal = {The Quarterly Journal of Economics},
author = {Dell, Melissa and Querubin, Pablo},
month = may,
year = {2018},
pages = {701--764},
}
@article{limbani_process_2019,
title = {Process evaluation in the field: global learnings from seven implementation research hypertension projects in low-and middle-income countries},
volume = {19},
issn = {1471-2458},
shorttitle = {Process evaluation in the field},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7261-8},
doi = {10.1186/s12889-019-7261-8},
abstract = {Process evaluation is increasingly recognized as an important component of effective implementation research and yet, there has been surprisingly little work to understand what constitutes best practice. Researchers use different methodologies describing causal pathways and understanding barriers and facilitators to implementation of interventions in diverse contexts and settings. We report on challenges and lessons learned from undertaking process evaluation of seven hypertension intervention trials funded through the Global Alliance of Chronic Diseases (GACD).},
number = {1},
urldate = {2024-03-14},
journal = {BMC Public Health},
author = {Limbani, Felix and Goudge, Jane and Joshi, Rohina and Maar, Marion A. and Miranda, J. Jaime and Oldenburg, Brian and Parker, Gary and Pesantes, Maria Amalia and Riddell, Michaela A. and Salam, Abdul and Trieu, Kathy and Thrift, Amanda G. and Van Olmen, Josefien and Vedanthan, Rajesh and Webster, Ruth and Yeates, Karen and Webster, Jacqui and Pozas, Alfonso Fernandez and Patel, Anushka and Pillay, Arti and Cotrez, Briana and Salinas, Carlos Aguilar and Nowson, Caryl and Johnson, Claire and Villalpando, Clicerio Gonzalez and Garcia-Ulloa, Cristina and Litzelman, Debra and Praveen, Devarsetty and Hua, Diane and Kakoulis, Dimitrios and Fottrell, Ed and Vucovich, Elsa Cornejo and Salazar, Francisco Gonzalez and Musa, Hadi and Chemusto, Harriet and Haghparast-Bidgoli, Hassan and Mutabazi, Jean Claude and Schultz, Jimaima and Odenkirchen, Joanne and Zavala-Loayza, Jose and Gyamfi, Joyce and Bobrow, Kirsty and Neira, Leticia and Maple-Brown, Louise and Lazo, Maria and Daivadanam, Meena and Wijemanne, Nilmini and Almeda-Valdes, Paloma and Camacho-Lopez, Paul and Delobelle, Peter and Zhang, Puhong and Saulson, Raelle and Guggilla, Rama and Kirkham, Renae and Angeles, Ricardo and Mohan, Sailesh and Tobe, Sheldon and Jha, Sujeet and Lei, Sun and Irazola, Vilma and Ma, Yuan and Shenderovich, Yulia and The Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases, Process Evaluation Working Group},
month = jul,
year = {2019},
keywords = {Complex interventions, Hypertension, Implementation science, Low and middle-income countries, Mixed-methods, Process evaluation},
pages = {953},
file = {Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\ghe\\Dropbox (Baruch College)\\research\\reference\\Zotero\\storage\\6UVRAIN4\\Limbani et al. - 2019 - Process evaluation in the field global learnings .pdf:application/pdf},
}
@article{oakley_process_2006,
title = {Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions},
volume = {332},
copyright = {© 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.},
issn = {0959-8138, 1468-5833},
url = {https://www.bmj.com/content/332/7538/413},
doi = {10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413},
abstract = {{\textless}p{\textgreater}\textit{Most randomised controlled trials focus on outcomes, not on the processes involved in implementing an intervention. Using an example from school based health promotion, this paper argues that including a process evaluation would improve the science of many randomised controlled trials}{\textless}/p{\textgreater}},
language = {en},
number = {7538},
urldate = {2024-03-14},
journal = {BMJ},
author = {Oakley, Ann and Strange, Vicki and Bonell, Chris and Allen, Elizabeth and Stephenson, Judith},
month = feb,
year = {2006},
pmid = {16484270},
note = {Publisher: British Medical Journal Publishing Group
Section: Analysis and Comment},
pages = {413--416},
file = {Full Text:C\:\\Users\\ghe\\Dropbox (Baruch College)\\research\\reference\\Zotero\\storage\\G5KU7WIM\\Oakley et al. - 2006 - Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials.pdf:application/pdf},
}
@article{helveston_he_davidson_2022,
author = {John Paul Helveston and Gang He and Michael R. Davidson},
title = {Quantifying the Cost Savings of Global Solar Photovoltaic
Supply Chains},
journal = {Nature},
volume = {612},
number = {7938},
pages = {83-87},
date = {2022-12-01},
url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05316-6},
doi = {10.1038/s41586-022-05316-6},
langid = {en}
}
@book{newcomer_handbook_2015,
address = {San Francisco},
edition = {4th edition},
title = {Handbook of {Practical} {Program} {Evaluation}},
isbn = {978-1-118-89360-9},
language = {English},
publisher = {Jossey-Bass},
author = {Newcomer, Kathryn E. and Hatry, Harry P. and Wholey, Joseph S.},
month = aug,
year = {2015},
}