Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Random weirdness with SolderJumpers #191

Open
cdntinker opened this issue Oct 26, 2023 · 6 comments
Open

Random weirdness with SolderJumpers #191

cdntinker opened this issue Oct 26, 2023 · 6 comments

Comments

@cdntinker
Copy link

Something very strange keeps happening with SolderJumpers.
They sometimes seem to import as bizarre shapes.
This seems to happen randomly. Doesn't seem entirely consistent. Some work, some don't.
Hard to describe, so I'll try to attach some images.

Linux (LMDE5)
FreeCAD (0.19)
kicadStepUp (10.20.7)
hub board
test board top
test board bottom

@easyw
Copy link
Owner

easyw commented Oct 27, 2023

@cdntinker
probably this is related tp the jumper footprint content. Not all the pad shapes are supported ATM.
Do you have a sample board to check?

@cdntinker
Copy link
Author

Apparently, GitHub doesn't like kicad_pcb files...
So I zipped it.
This is the board file that created the 2nd & 3rd pics above.

zz.kicad_pcb.zip

@luzpaz
Copy link
Contributor

luzpaz commented Nov 2, 2023

@cdntinker you're using an obsolete version of freecad. Current stable is 0.21.1

@cdntinker
Copy link
Author

@luzpaz
Yes, I'm running the version that works with the current version of my OS.
One day, I'll take the time & find the energy to fully upgrade my dev machine from LMDE 5 to LMDE 6 & find out what versions of things work & break.

@luzpaz
Copy link
Contributor

luzpaz commented Nov 3, 2023

@easyw can you reproduce with the attached file ?

@easyw
Copy link
Owner

easyw commented Nov 13, 2023

It slightly depens on FC version, it depends more on OCC version.

This issue is related to the net tie fp and FreeCAD... this net-tie-footprint geometry goes into coplanar OCC issues:
https://discourse.mcneel.com/t/coplanar-surfaces-boolean-vs-planar-for-union-difference-and-intersect/152291

Unfortunately not all the kicad pad type can be fully converted to a clean geometry.
The OP may consider to move to a different net tie footprint as suggested here:
#196 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants