You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The exponential growth distribution is equivalent to exponentially tilting the $\mathcal{U}(0,1)$ distribution. In general for abs. cont. distributions it changes the pdf from $f(t) \to e^{rt} f(t) / M(r)$ and on the linked wiki page there are some useful distributions where the tilted version is known (e.g. Gamma tilted by $r$ but conditioned onto [0,1] is analytically doable).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
seabbs
changed the title
Possibly generalise exponential growth distribution as a tilted distribution
Generalise exponential growth distribution as a tilted distribution
Aug 30, 2024
@SamuelBrand1 I think you did a bit more exploration of this. Can you throw it up if so?
I did a wee thing on if primary time had a reference of (say) truncated Normal on $[0, w_P]$ rather than a uniform then we still get the primary CDF dropping out analytically (because tilted Normal is equivalent to a Normal with shifted params).
The modelling idea here would be combining the concept of certain times in a window being a priori more probable times for a primary event and then combining that with the effect of exponential growth in event incidence.
But I don't know if we want to go forwards with this.
The exponential growth distribution is equivalent to exponentially tilting the$\mathcal{U}(0,1)$ distribution. In general for abs. cont. distributions it changes the pdf from $f(t) \to e^{rt} f(t) / M(r)$ and on the linked wiki page there are some useful distributions where the tilted version is known (e.g. Gamma tilted by $r$ but conditioned onto [0,1] is analytically doable).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: