Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fmudesign: alternative to specify distributions with percentiles #668

Open
tralsos opened this issue Mar 6, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

fmudesign: alternative to specify distributions with percentiles #668

tralsos opened this issue Mar 6, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
christmas-review Issues and PRs for Christmas review enhancement New feature or request fmudesign

Comments

@tralsos
Copy link
Contributor

tralsos commented Mar 6, 2020

It would be nice if we could chose what the dist_param1 etc. should represent. Should it be minimum/maximum or P90/P10. This will require extra columns where one specifies this. One could also implement this as two distributions, e.g:

triangular that uses min, mode, max
triangular_p10_p90 that uses P90, mode and P10 as input
This request covers all continuous distributions.

@tralsos tralsos added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 6, 2020
@tralsos
Copy link
Contributor Author

tralsos commented Mar 6, 2020

Merged with enhancement request on providing truncated lognormal distribution (we have truncated normal and lognormal currently). There is no wiki article on truncated lognormal and it is not mentioned in https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/stats.html. Neither in ERT.

Feedback from BKH: Possible implementation is to transform parameters to normal distribution, simulate a truncated normal distribution and then transform values back. Particularly useful if input is not mean and std but e.g. P90 and P10.
Often doing something similar for e.g. uncertainties in permeability where you want to multiply by 5 or divide by 5. Instead of having 1/5 and 5 as input, using pert distribution with p90/ml/p10 = -0.7, 0, 0.7. Then using 10^simulated values before exporting.

@dafeda dafeda transferred this issue from equinor/fmu-tools Nov 28, 2024
@eivindjahren eivindjahren added the christmas-review Issues and PRs for Christmas review label Dec 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
christmas-review Issues and PRs for Christmas review enhancement New feature or request fmudesign
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants