Final Retrospective Review #15
Description
First 5 points + Key Feature Writeup + CB MC:
| Assignment | Points | Grade | Evidence | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| My Team Teach Lesson | 1 | 0.85 |  |
Given by Mr. Mort |
| SeedTracker Drawio Plan | 1 | 0.87 |  |
Good diagram, shows all processes needed, could be a little neater |
| AP Exam Practice Team Teach Lessons/HWs | 1 | 0.86 |  |
Given by lesson presenters and graders |
| Classwide Project Contribution Commits/Analytics | 1 | 0.85 |  |
Commits on our class project frontend and backend, however some of them were a little last-minute |
| Personal Blogs/Presentations | 1 | 0.87 | PBL Review Blog | Just one quick example of many blogs/issues I made for presentations to Mr. Mort for live reviews |
| Key Feature Writeup | 1 | 0.87 | PBL Review Blog | Good writeup, included burndown list and drawio plans |
| CollegeBoard MCQ | 1 | 0.9 |  Corrections/Learnings Blog |
did mcq, did corrections blog to show my learning and plans for future practice |
| Total | 7 | 6.07 |
2 points for Full Stack Feature Demo:
highlight java and natm feedback
10th point:
- Sent plan to Mr. Mort on Slack DMs for this review
- Notes column on self grading with notes explaining the grade I gave myself
- Looked at some different CSP projects at NATM and gave feedback as a CSA student on their google forms
- CompSci journey: CSP, MAP, REHS, CSA, major at colleges, work in cybersec w cyberpatriot experience
- Strengths: technical knowledge, learning new concepts fast
- Weaknesses: tendency to not keep my teammates updated which sometimes leads to discrepancies in our plans, need to improve on
- Next steps on project is outlined in the PBL review burndown list
- Review time 1 min