Call for Input: Editor Removal (@gcolvin)

[SamWilsn]

Call for Input

Decision	Do we remove @gcolvin as an Editor?
If Affirmed	@gcolvin is moved to emeritus and removed from the yaml files.
If Rejected	No change
Method	Unanimous (minus the Editor being removed)
Deadline	December 4, 2024

Background

EIPs reviewed in the past year: 2
ERCs reviewed in the past year: 0

Checklist

I, the opener of this Call for Input, have completed the following:

• Filled in a descriptive title.
• Filled in the "Decision" field.
• Filled in the "If Affirmed" field.
• Filled in the "If Rejected" field.
• Filled in the "Method" field.
• Filled in the "Deadline" field to be thirty days from creation.
• Added any relevant background information (or removed the section.)
• Published a notice in writing to the usual channels frequented by EIP Editors (likely Discord.)
• Commented on this Call for Input, clearly stating my opinion (or abstention.)

[SamWilsn]

in favour

---

Greg has not been active over the past year, so I believe he should be removed from active editor status. That said, I'd support his return in the future.

[abcoathup]

In favor

If you aren't an active editor (for whatever reason) it is best to step down. My preference is that editors step down themselves.

EIP-1 Emeritus EIP editors is to acknowledge the amazing contribution of past editors.

Plus you can return as an editor.