[OP Stack Deployment] Running two sequencers to solve the single-point failure problem #313
Unanswered
luleigreat
asked this question in
Deploying the OP Stack
Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
Sharing Transaction PoolYou're going to want to peer your NotesYou don't want both of these nodes to have the Documentation:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Did you check the documentation?
Did you check for duplicate questions?
Issue Description
I have scaned the responses in discord and disccusions about how to avoid single point failure.
I know one of the resolution is the blue green deployment strategy.
And the team have an op-conductor service that can help to manage the blue green deployment workflow.(I don't know how to run the service though.)
My question here is:
I tried to run two sequencers , they can keep in sync with no user transactions. But when I send a transaction to the first sequencer, the blocks of the two sequencers forked, the second sequencer does not contain the tx sent to the first.
My running command:
op-node A:
op-node B:
Logs
No response
Additional Information
No response
Feedback
No response
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions