-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 325
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Execution Layer Meeting 184 #982
Comments
I would like to discuss eip 2935 and eip 7545. |
If we have time, I would like to bring up for discussion EIP 7212 and 3074 for EOAs and CFI. |
If we are moving on to discussing CFI states I would like to add the EOF EIPs to that list for consideration. I would also request the retroactive EIPs be moved earlier in the agenda, and time boxed if needed. |
This sounds like a great process point! Wonder if for each EIP discussion there should be a pre-defined champion who's willing to pound the table, in writing? And that should allow for a nice timeboxed conversation, with clear next steps or blockers? |
Thanks for the input, everybody! To start from the bottom: @gakonst generally agreed. To make sure we get through what we missed last time, I've moved it to the top. We can start with your team's state growth research, and then the two retro EIPs (cc: @petertdavies). Then I want to wrap up the Dencun EIPs. For the Pectra proposals, we'll do a couple minutes on each by the person who posted it on the agenda (cc: @charles-cooper) . Once we get through the list, it'd be good to hear from all the client teams about what we want to include in the first Pectra devnets so we can start working on those 😄 |
Could we add EIP-6493 (SSZ Transaction Signature Scheme) for consideration, please? (Cc @protolambda) |
I'll be there to share latest updates for RIP-7212 and answer questions related to it. |
@benjaminion I've added it to the Pectra list. Do you (or proto) want to give a quick overview for why it'd be valuable on the call? |
Many thanks! Yep, Mr. Lambda will give the 2 minute pitch. |
I would also like to pitch ethereum/EIPs#8357 (EIP-7664: Access-Key opcode) |
@adietrichs and I presented our proposal for an issuance change in Electra in connection with our research on endgame staking economics on ACDC some time ago. Although it would be a consensus layer change, if there is time today, we would like to flag this as a topic to ACDE as well. |
would love to share that latest on EIP-7547 and its interaction with 3074 and 4337 :D |
Can we quickly mention the higher-than-usual miss block rate on the mainnet yesterday? |
Agreed @terencechain - worth understanding the impact on EL vs CL, and where EL teams should be spending more time on? Eg txpool, or engine api kzg times etc |
Closed in favor of #997 |
Meeting Info
#allcoredevs
Discord channel shortly before the callAgenda
pectra-devnet-1
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: