Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No build for Linux x86_64 #281

Open
scruss opened this issue Oct 11, 2016 · 5 comments
Open

No build for Linux x86_64 #281

scruss opened this issue Oct 11, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@scruss
Copy link

scruss commented Oct 11, 2016

Description

Robopaint will not run on 64 bit systems as the binaries are all 32 bit.

Steps to reproduce OR Feature idea (Delete one)

  1. extract the archive
  2. double click on the icon
  3. … nothing happens
  4. open a terminal, execute the program, and get error while loading shared libraries: libgobject-2.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
  5. check the executable with file and find that it's 32 bit only.

Version affected (if bug)

v0.9.5

What operating system are you running?

Linux: Ubuntu 16.04 x86_64

How did you install RoboPaint?

Copied files from zip

What robot are you using?

Other (specify): Roland plotter

Is the robot you want to control directly connected to RoboPaint?

No, I am using RoboPaint in simulation mode.

@oskay
Copy link
Contributor

oskay commented Oct 11, 2016

Have you tried the newer versions? I would recommend trying with v2.0.0 Beta 2.

@scruss
Copy link
Author

scruss commented Oct 11, 2016

I followed the Click here for the latest release link under Downloads / Install, and it took me to v0.95

@docprofsky
Copy link
Collaborator

v0.9.5 is the latest stable release, however the v2.0.0-Beta.2 (and Beta.1) release have many significant improvements to RoboPaint. We probably should update the documentation to reflect this.

You can find the v2.0.0-Beta.2 release on the releases page.

@oskay
Copy link
Contributor

oskay commented Oct 11, 2016

It does indeed link to the older version. :(
This does appear to be a significant failure of documentation.

Would you please give the current version a try?

@docprofsky
Copy link
Collaborator

It links to the most recent release, ignoring pre-releases.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants