You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Useful to provide context on how high-coverage a contig is, relative to other contigs; also, more importantly, useful if normalized-coverage-clamping happens for min / max skew bins. In this case, it would probably make sense to use unnormalized coverages for computing the PTRs?
Should also update the tutorial about this.
Output unnormalized coverages (i.e. just the median coverage in each bin). The easiest way to handle this is just adding an extra column to the TSV output of covskew called MedianCoverage or something.
Test
Update tutorial to explain
In tutorial, show that PTRs produced using unnorm and norm coverages are roughly the same (assuming that clamping has not happened, or at least hasn't impacted the min/max skew bins' norm coverages)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Useful to provide context on how high-coverage a contig is, relative to other contigs; also, more importantly, useful if normalized-coverage-clamping happens for min / max skew bins. In this case, it would probably make sense to use unnormalized coverages for computing the PTRs?
Should also update the tutorial about this.
covskew
calledMedianCoverage
or something.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: