Replies: 1 comment 4 replies
-
Yes. If your input had an area of 1 m2 but because of grid snapping in the FDS domain it was 2 m2, then FDS would reduce the HRRPUA by a factor of 2 so you would get the desired total heat release. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I am trying to found out how the area referenced changes when the HRR is output.
In the user guide,
"The OBST dimensions specified by XB in the input file may not (usually do not) perfectly align with the underlying Cartesian mesh. FDS then “snaps” the geometry to fill (or void) the volume of the nearest cell."
"If a specified mass flux boundary (including HRRPUA) is given, then FDS will automatically adjust this mass flux so that the total of the specified area times the specified mass flux is maintained. (user guide 6.8.0 ,7.2.3 Specified Versus Actual Areas)"
I found the following statement.
Now I thought I want to specify the area by XB in the OBST line and set the HRRPUA in the SURF line.
Does this mean that the FDS changes specified HRRPUA to adjusted HRRPUA so that specified area x specified HRRPUA = Area-delimited-by-mesh x adjusted HRRPUA?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions