Skip to content

Make anonymous type names prettier #117

@Schamper

Description

@Schamper

Regarding this: https://github.com/fox-it/dissect.cstruct/pull/72/files#r1995848713

Because we are more "correct" now when it comes to the type names, some repr output has become a bit uglier. We can "patch this up" in the parser when we learn that such a structure is part of a named field, but that complicates things again when generating a stub.

For that PR we chose to go for the more correct, easier to deal with naming for stub generation and make it prettier later.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions