-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Parachain didn't produce blocks #1801
Comments
@shanithkk Thanks for taking the time to write an issue. The In the meantime, you can update it locally by running Be sure to clear your chain databases before restarting your network ( |
Hi @mattheworris, i was build a spec using parity/polkadot:latest image, im not able to fix this issue. but using |
Please make sure to remove any persistent storage that may be storing the chain state when starting your nodes. Ideally, the specs should be generated with the same version of polkadot as the relay chain nodes. However, you can make sure all the versions of polkadot are the same by editing the following files. (Again, this will be corrected in an upcoming PR).
You can view the draft PR #1808 |
Thank you @mattheworris , also can you provide how to run using docker image Currently i'm running two relay chains polkadot:v1.1.0 Steps to reproduce
|
|
# Goal Issue #1801 reported that the local parachain wasn't making blocks when following the directions for setting up a local relay chain. `rococo-local.json`, the chain spec file used to setup the local relay chain development environment was out of date with the recent versions of the polkadot-sdk and needed to be updated. Closes #1801 # Checklist - [ ] Chain spec updated - [ ] Custom RPC OR Runtime API added/changed? Updated js/api-augment. - [ ] Design doc(s) updated - [ ] Tests added - [ ] Benchmarks added - [ ] Weights updated
Discription
after running the parachain locally, parachain didn't create any new blocks.
Steps to reproduce
Expected Outcome:
parachain produce new blocks
Screenshot
![Screenshot 2023-12-05 at 1 40 41 AM](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/59169878/287820645-0af8b72e-00c8-4a6a-854b-db5450c8ba2a.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.XScdVp95ijdjaYaQJJsiaWDjFiwkkepJc79MhRx_JYs)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: