Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PIA - Protein Inference Algorithms #85

Open
bgruening opened this issue Nov 9, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

PIA - Protein Inference Algorithms #85

bgruening opened this issue Nov 9, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@bgruening
Copy link
Member

Is this intersting for GalaxyP?
https://github.com/mpc-bioinformatics/pia

@PratikDJagtap
Copy link
Member

Hello Bjoern,

While on one side, the feature mentioned below within PIA - would be good
to have - we already have a protein inference algorithm in PeptideShaker.

"... allows you to inspect your peptide spectrum matches, calculate FDR
values across different search engine results and visualize the
correspondence between PSMs, peptides and proteins."

My vote would be to keep it on the watch list but not wrap it now.

Regards,
Pratik

Pratik Jagtap,

Research Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology
and Biophysics,

University of Minnesota.

Address: 7-166 MCB, 420 Washington Ave SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455

*Phone: 612-624-0381 http://612-624-0381/ Email: pjagtap@umn.edu
pjagtap@umn.edu *

*Twitter: twitter.com/pratikomics http://twitter.com/pratikomics
Google Scholar: z.umn.edu/pjgs http://z.umn.edu/pjgs *

http://z.umn.edu/galaxypreferences

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Björn Grüning notifications@github.com
wrote:

Is this intersting for GalaxyP?
https://github.com/mpc-bioinformatics/pia


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#85, or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKL0OpnsHPhY7bXIWME31eDIvdUVLDJgks5q8atugaJpZM4KtbA1
.

@PratikDJagtap
Copy link
Member

I would agree on Pratik's comment - interesting but not a high priority
right now. Somewhat redundant with functionality already available in
PeptideShaker, but does have some interesting visualization aspects it
looks like.

  • TG

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Pratik Jagtap pjagtap@umn.edu wrote:

Hello Bjoern,

While on one side, the feature mentioned below within PIA - would be
good to have - we already have a protein inference algorithm in
PeptideShaker.

"... allows you to inspect your peptide spectrum matches, calculate FDR
values across different search engine results and visualize the
correspondence between PSMs, peptides and proteins."

My vote would be to keep it on the watch list but not wrap it now.

Regards,
Pratik

Pratik Jagtap,

Research Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Molecular
Biology and Biophysics,

University of Minnesota.

Address: 7-166 MCB, 420 Washington Ave SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455

*Phone: 612-624-0381 http://612-624-0381/ Email: pjagtap@umn.edu
pjagtap@umn.edu *

*Twitter: twitter.com/pratikomics http://twitter.com/pratikomics
Google Scholar: z.umn.edu/pjgs http://z.umn.edu/pjgs *

http://z.umn.edu/galaxypreferences

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Björn Grüning notifications@github.com
wrote:

Is this intersting for GalaxyP?
https://github.com/mpc-bioinformatics/pia


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#85, or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKL0OpnsHPhY7bXIWME31eDIvdUVLDJgks5q8atugaJpZM4KtbA1
.

Tim Griffin, Ph.D.
Professor, and
Director, Center for Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics
University of Minnesota
Dept. of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics
6-155 Jackson Hall
321 Church Street SE
Minneapolis, MN 55455
USA

Office: 7-144 Molecular Cellular Biology (MCB)

Tel: 612-624-5249
Fax: 612-624-0432
Email: tgriffin@umn.edu

https://www.cbs.umn.edu/bmbb/contacts/timothy-j-griffin
Center for Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics website:
http://www.cbs.umn.edu/msp/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants