Roadmap question: Any plans to support Conductor in Antigravity IDE?

[rubickecho]

Hi,

Is there any plan (now or in the future) to support Conductor in Antigravity IDE?

I understand Conductor is currently designed as a Gemini CLI extension. I’m mainly curious whether the lack of Antigravity support is a deliberate long-term choice, or if IDE integration is being considered down the road.

Thanks!

[Nsomnia]

Isn't antigravity in the non-fast regular mode essentially that? I gotta try this extension still so well see, installing a new nvm instance for gemjni-cli with a clone of my opencode with Gemini project by itself and will report back the difference.

Can install any extension you want in antigravity so i imagin quite a few. Cursor will be hard to catch up to with their custom planning model integration.

Antigravity is still useless even with free sonnet usage IMHO. "Oh you got stuck in an inf-loop while running the compiler bash script doing cmake and ninja commands for 12 hours? Antigravity levels of wtf-breakage!".

/Me a nub just rambling, arch my only real skill, so this comment isn't worth 2 commits worth of anything nor "sense", btw.

[sherzat3]

Thanks for the suggestion, @rubickecho! We're currently looking into this. We'll post updates here as we have more updates.

[edithatogo]

@sherzat3 and @rubickecho. I have it working in Antigravity, reasonably well, by building on work others have in open pull requests. Presumably the differences in scaffolding contribute to it behaving differently in Antigravity (e.g. it tends to create a single spec/plan file which of course then gets recreated with its own todo/workflow/implementation documents, but it still works- #49.

[hlhr202]

https://github.com/hlhr202/Conductor-for-all
try this. no need to install cli tool, just install prompt