You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current Travis config doesn't do anything useful. A working config could test that the build procedure is able to run all the way through; however, the build as specified by the Makefile requires a very large amount of memory to run (~100 GB). We could:
Make the the inputs entirely configurable and build a similar but much smaller database via Travis.
Forget about Travis and automate the build on Jenkins with sufficient resources instead. In this scenario we could run content-specific validations and also deploy the output.
My opinion of Travis has been rather dropping recently. And being able to test the build all the way through sounds awful nice to me considering all of the various problems we've had with the pipeline here and there (extra cool if versioning of the data is involved).
However, I think that the travis builds are meant specifically to deal with code testing, unit tests, and the like, with the jenkins stuff a little bit more towards the data testing and pipeline. It may be that we want to have the lighter code-oriented stuff in travis and data in jenkins anyways.
I think "1" is probably good for some parts, "2" will probably need to happen as well at some point, which pretty much would mean "3" 😢
Thanks. Having the makefile work off of a configuration (as in "1") kind of seems like a step too far to me. It is itself a configuration of various other tools. I agree that "2" needs to happen either way.
The current Travis config doesn't do anything useful. A working config could test that the build procedure is able to run all the way through; however, the build as specified by the Makefile requires a very large amount of memory to run (~100 GB). We could:
Opinions @cmungall or @kltm?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: